{"id":"W2903399945","doi":"","title":"INEQUITY IN EQUITABLE SET-OFF: TELFORD V HOLT REVISITED","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Set (abstract data type); Supreme court; Law and economics; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00284934,0.0001621831,0.0007917112,0.0001716225,0.0001938543,0.00007079741,0.0005761549,0.0001049773,0.002115486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003589589,0.0001382309,0.0001493527,0.0003205588,0.0001159505,0.0002372554,0.00007046039,0.0001318589,0.005341356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008717845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001867808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1193903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3002742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978428,0.00006160892,0.0009712173,0.0003914171,0.00003206047,0.0007008876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985389,0.00006560142,0.0003331638,0.0007370872,0.0000295335,0.0002957853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000368358,0.00001173673,0.03313865,0.0005930158,0.00004491525,0.00001306243,0.0001328897,0.000001123449,0.000001863203,0.8826423,0.05848095,0.02493576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002608776,0.00001713245,0.004601475,0.001205327,0.000008359626,0.000006035134,0.000005170212,0.00001366261,0.000001636433,0.02877775,0.9648465,0.0002560961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0151994,0.5214858,0.00007996958,0.05747499,0.001182329,0.002293517,0.0009934412,0.00006437423,0.4012262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8803588,0.108558,0.00001701189,0.007910716,0.0003179379,0.00007565924,0.00001758492,0.00004199217,0.002702279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06130980770966662,"score_gpt":0.2434568223356417,"score_spread":0.182147014625975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}