{"id":"W2903446828","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v7i3.451","title":"Novel Conversations: Connecting With Disability in Three Examples of Popular Fiction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Popular fiction; Disability studies; Popular culture; Sociology; Media studies; Inclusion (mineral); Public sphere; Ableism; Aesthetics; Psychology; History; Literature; Gender studies; Art; Political science; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000532408,0.0001215607,0.0003247307,0.00008100276,0.0003429695,0.0000557866,0.0001157575,0.0000266021,0.0003046244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007484668,0.00009614341,0.00007273962,0.00008299232,0.002495912,0.0004359248,0.000008191554,0.0001175404,0.000001210783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003017278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001660844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02594471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8386768,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988747,0.00006339735,0.000565393,0.0001455341,0.0001526317,0.0001982922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985682,0.0002467019,0.0002069122,0.0001679495,0.0006918404,0.0001184083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008248922,0.0001579839,0.6669869,0.0001695802,0.0001971927,0.000004020687,0.2726421,0.00003271484,0.00001715993,0.05770133,0.0002317025,0.001776802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001387405,0.0009144576,0.419352,0.0004749625,0.000139913,0.00002660815,0.5422974,0.00007263905,0.00006088832,0.01302566,0.02192638,0.000321733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995862,0.0007185451,0.00009068983,0.00122811,0.000489481,0.0001517068,0.00008173913,0.000006284625,0.001371419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.000005901704,0.0002939596,0.00005580313,0.0004210495,0.000003217427,0.000003985698,0.000008897059,0.00002734235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8127321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1030421225644968,"score_gpt":0.2790339223171625,"score_spread":0.1759917997526657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}