{"id":"W2903545128","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.023","title":"Getting more out of meta-analyses: a new approach to meta-analysis in light of unexplained heterogeneity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Random effects model; Study heterogeneity; Medicine; Subgroup analysis; Intervention (counseling); Confidence interval; Population; Econometrics; Statistics; Internal medicine; Psychiatry; Mathematics; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3729672,0.01061864,0.03934775,0.01672372,0.004330227,0.01886292,0.01391499,0.01240191,0.006006795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6754944,0.005284942,0.03190722,0.01360832,0.009669427,0.03081456,0.01292053,0.0322574,0.0008275892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003762199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009498585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004238525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008530841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4628428,0.4548978,0.0368351,0.0253607,0.01878432,0.001279134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2251596,0.7100278,0.01447174,0.03941819,0.008877182,0.002045572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006053829,0.0007638502,0.01549176,0.06198257,0.3682366,0.002774034,0.01092837,0.01739901,0.002751034,0.09856146,0.05126576,0.3637917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003060127,0.001260695,0.004277916,0.0117878,0.1301065,0.001170876,0.001235144,0.05034487,0.001159586,0.7716438,0.02288189,0.001070791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005753531,0.1032566,0.8326977,0.04351991,0.009709237,0.001191939,0.0008281798,0.001421466,0.001621478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1702529,0.02283021,0.7409141,0.0455462,0.01444594,0.00278739,0.0005253188,0.001462333,0.00123549],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6270328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7732431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9712719406525165,"score_gpt":0.7148035791354833,"score_spread":0.2564683615170332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}