{"id":"W2903655207","doi":"10.1086/699915","title":"The Credibility of Party Policy Rhetoric Survey Experimental Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Credibility; Skepticism; Reputation; Face value; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Incentive; Political science; Order (exchange); Rhetoric; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04860168,0.0005638159,0.0008223041,0.00189577,0.000927967,0.002901182,0.001028686,0.00210682,0.0154061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2680682,0.0005667979,0.0006027533,0.001444021,0.003994884,0.002801112,0.001968876,0.002439466,0.001734267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001247915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006289264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007897993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005957207,"domain_scores_codex":[0.945806,0.03878248,0.002943812,0.003533216,0.008063895,0.0008705913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3669239,0.5415421,0.05169182,0.02292396,0.0156541,0.001264065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03533405,0.01768681,0.4559372,0.01012914,0.00519778,0.0007717886,0.02613132,0.006679487,0.04397347,0.1293469,0.009901946,0.2589101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058255,0.02287163,0.6901717,0.003273309,0.003995725,0.001579156,0.01552716,0.02266956,0.05645325,0.1137838,0.0632975,0.0005517727],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9160869,0.002736708,0.008296084,0.003290162,0.0002768535,0.0003696497,0.0008352404,0.00004927568,0.06805918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958714,0.0006712569,0.001302221,0.0005224958,0.0001465581,0.0001551799,0.0002854867,0.00002047518,0.001024857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04860168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2570333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.181205912515138,"score_gpt":0.4618344134253807,"score_spread":0.2806285009102428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}