{"id":"W2903662889","doi":"10.1017/s0007087418000778","title":"Imperial vernacular: phytonymy, philology and disciplinarity in the Indo-Pacific, 1800–1900","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Sussex","keywords":"Indigenous; Vernacular; Philology; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Historiography; History; Anthropology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Politics; Sociology; Ethnology; Literature; Linguistics; Archaeology; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy; Art; Ecology; Law; Feminism","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009314513,0.0002369168,0.0002445474,0.001311862,0.00707256,0.002883815,0.0005306468,0.0007333667,0.003486822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001928356,0.0001933619,0.00008443322,0.002669956,0.01359699,0.003889639,0.002839608,0.003227598,0.000246609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005225224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002720639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03127466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04838789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995393,0.0001303651,0.00002346521,0.0001009383,0.0001269943,0.00007897162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.0002800566,0.00009550544,0.00005668038,0.00008612167,0.0001017579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005729871,0.0000359847,0.007897538,0.0003355319,0.000009920635,0.0008543033,0.6206759,0.00006572801,0.001055868,0.29792,0.007992815,0.06309912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001253783,0.00008082877,0.0772653,0.0005172708,0.00001423392,0.0009627583,0.07953474,0.0001102825,0.0005641641,0.01769698,0.8232071,0.00003380474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3577373,0.05687792,0.0009807561,0.01511492,0.001010424,0.00003960059,0.00007868611,0.00003323509,0.5681272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382457,0.01346733,0.0004085106,0.0007722546,0.0005401116,0.00002994863,0.00003033554,0.00002537304,0.04648042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06218529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04118774281540227,"score_gpt":0.3106625201548008,"score_spread":0.2694747773393986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}