{"id":"W2903662889","doi":"10.1017/s0007087418000778","title":"Imperial vernacular: phytonymy, philology and disciplinarity in the Indo-Pacific, 1800–1900","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal for the History of Science","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Sussex","keywords":"Indigenous; Vernacular; Philology; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Historiography; History; Anthropology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Politics; Sociology; Ethnology; Literature; Linguistics; Archaeology; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy; Art; Ecology; Law; Feminism","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006633408,0.00008785196,0.0001589941,0.00005614654,0.009605267,0.0002190563,0.001591815,0.00006616578,0.00009062649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002741251,0.0000543866,0.00008898184,0.000265391,0.01988722,0.0003458336,0.00006864345,0.0003902402,0.000005301947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005924383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009112241,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003813377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01197596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982752,0.0002504009,0.0002558016,0.0001926725,0.0005875381,0.0004384099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907,0.0001943178,0.0002431225,0.0002011239,0.0002067924,0.00008460271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002010711,0.0001621074,0.0004836491,0.00001456476,0.00002847409,0.00004412193,0.8171422,0.000004683206,0.00249647,0.01338553,0.1384344,0.02760271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004636607,0.0002362662,0.01062109,0.00005244394,0.00004423361,0.0006703877,0.04198474,0.00001130827,0.00003167895,0.01073741,0.9349803,0.0001665098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9247981,0.01036812,0.0001168386,0.00641589,0.01218346,0.0009055515,0.00002407493,0.00002139297,0.04516661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919487,0.0006058688,0.00006350083,0.0002444659,0.001207565,0.00001127041,2.638077e-7,0.000006162587,0.00591224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7965459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04118774281540227,"score_gpt":0.3106625201548008,"score_spread":0.2694747773393986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}