{"id":"W2903697342","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2018-0352","title":"An evolutionary stochastic discrete time-cost trade-off method","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Computer science; Duration (music); Mode (computer interface); Process (computing); Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Selection (genetic algorithm); Industrial engineering; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003206961,0.0002158315,0.0003996699,0.001268768,0.0002135157,0.0002983753,0.001068045,0.0001176429,0.001530319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003522665,0.000185736,0.0001859395,0.0008719299,0.0001445979,0.000685139,0.00001916128,0.0004515855,0.0001022355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002192073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001191569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001823618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006614249,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973276,0.0001590999,0.0008416394,0.0002869841,0.0008041136,0.0005805342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968097,0.0007422621,0.000294991,0.0004355169,0.0003331529,0.001384341],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005132613,0.00001931963,0.001237304,0.00001112221,0.0001473486,0.0003691573,0.004762809,0.9223682,0.007180213,0.000976961,0.01038102,0.05249523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000641318,0.0004384293,0.009310524,0.0002062998,0.00006048302,0.002179888,0.0007127503,0.9359728,0.000303266,0.001857623,0.04773902,0.0005775818],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02717952,0.0007732838,0.9661844,0.0008621799,0.001223508,0.0001947474,0.00005302443,0.00003560234,0.003493673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739473,0.00000106979,0.02478866,0.00009876298,0.001019237,0.000002186567,0.00000185128,0.00003536992,0.000105494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03233382638574227,"score_gpt":0.3180598952190216,"score_spread":0.2857260688332793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}