{"id":"W2903989439","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.12.011","title":"Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor – Cardiostat™ – Compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Electrocardiology","topic":"Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec","funders":"Fondation Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec","keywords":"Ambulatory ECG; Medicine; Ambulatory; Cardiology; Atrial fibrillation; Atrial flutter; Internal medicine; Electrocardiography; Lead (geology); Holter monitor","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005761299,0.0001781257,0.001257848,0.0003785876,0.00008321329,0.00001434028,0.00004362536,0.0001079866,0.000002409422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000342794,0.0001524544,0.0004358625,0.0002993152,0.0001248971,0.00008475347,0.00004216623,0.0002130185,0.000008756507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001808874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008379596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.025796e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982797,0.0001022814,0.0006607436,0.0001921466,0.0004411788,0.0003239713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977431,0.0001480241,0.0003961221,0.0002375463,0.001329981,0.000145222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003094344,0.00006686222,0.121706,0.00004431344,0.001777855,0.0000244799,0.0009305016,0.0008155351,0.8645132,0.00001433528,0.004097715,0.002914884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00573186,0.008933884,0.1042314,0.0004504586,0.00105732,0.005639076,0.001249354,0.00006542286,0.846796,0.00005245766,0.02539602,0.0003967169],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670229,0.001077891,0.0259259,0.0001673042,0.001109333,0.0001701794,0.00001001692,0.00002388721,0.004492572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905418,0.00006002694,0.006793945,0.000070502,0.002448033,0.000002388178,0.000001965309,0.0000242596,0.00005704493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02351892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.621691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04419731433148918,"score_gpt":0.3323678994957659,"score_spread":0.2881705851642767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}