{"id":"W2904344060","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23427","title":"Development of novel method for quantitative determination of carbon chemical reactivity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Thermogravimetric analysis; Repeatability; Process engineering; Coke; Reactivity (psychology); Materials science; Biological system; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Engineering; Chromatography; Metallurgy; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001716742,0.0008747214,0.0008180541,0.001788432,0.0004537795,0.0006192924,0.001110586,0.001172842,0.00115662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001864268,0.0005655017,0.0004112927,0.000768591,0.0005652086,0.0008167502,0.000681309,0.001581519,0.0009547139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004842457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008043675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006243771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002075592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976636,0.0002760167,0.0001121138,0.0006691145,0.001207597,0.00007149453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.0003780779,0.0001615589,0.0001558939,0.0005507877,0.0000576022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001572398,0.00002862203,0.0001875365,0.0001881494,0.00001330101,0.00004587294,0.0000359077,0.0001279021,0.9788179,0.000440878,0.0002090944,0.01988904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008473547,0.0001422155,0.001357227,0.00002970162,0.00002695732,0.0003503212,0.00003712692,0.006401103,0.9830702,0.0003127371,0.008218982,0.00004497608],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04784803,0.005355299,0.9402089,0.0002102613,0.0005904324,0.0004054306,0.0005690472,0.001570183,0.003242434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1689963,0.003173522,0.8212147,0.0001836332,0.0001043079,0.0009004465,0.0004460014,0.0001169936,0.00486409],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001788432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009079158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02164024346447322,"score_gpt":0.2508369844115813,"score_spread":0.2291967409471081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}