{"id":"W2904354339","doi":"10.1111/risa.13248","title":"Science for Policy: A Case Study of Scientific Polarization, Values, and the Framing of Risk and Uncertainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Distrust; Harm; Perception; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08485675,0.0009315605,0.001864567,0.004876213,0.05590869,0.03083764,0.004742217,0.03059531,0.005593786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08348057,0.0008483423,0.001731029,0.01000491,0.04428247,0.02089291,0.01721251,0.0245154,0.0007074336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03257231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02617713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01945853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01582283,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8926868,0.08868953,0.001626032,0.002784453,0.007863101,0.006349977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8407031,0.1417456,0.004435624,0.004014005,0.00506076,0.004040895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001203072,0.0002806727,0.002465441,0.0002365556,0.00004309366,0.009246022,0.2719641,0.001528623,0.0005286816,0.692905,0.00734894,0.0133326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001100933,0.0002081025,0.001766563,0.0009491498,0.00006479581,0.001827472,0.4102018,0.003033237,0.001165624,0.295309,0.2852496,0.0001146572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4038934,0.00638751,0.02252078,0.3234368,0.000989148,0.0005766025,0.0001470107,0.00009392958,0.2419548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966789,0.003265794,0.006797375,0.01259443,0.0003076248,0.0005139851,0.00004481807,0.00008071878,0.009606201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9440913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4487708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01643908838932277,"score_gpt":0.3473579329149299,"score_spread":0.3309188445256071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}