{"id":"W2904354339","doi":"10.1111/risa.13248","title":"Science for Policy: A Case Study of Scientific Polarization, Values, and the Framing of Risk and Uncertainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Distrust; Harm; Perception; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004796675,0.00005635974,0.0001882748,0.00070441,0.002245325,0.0001484766,0.000166444,0.00002157207,0.00001602495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115788,0.00003880664,0.00006125243,0.004037355,0.00389488,0.0001285872,0.00008814905,0.00003583303,4.207978e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003186277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001374094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1617242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06690245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987128,0.0003014533,0.0002154166,0.0002524187,0.0003708267,0.0001470465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.0002065382,0.000257592,0.0002420569,0.0004307158,0.00006143414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000649107,0.000274867,0.3942671,0.00001416126,0.0005986405,0.000001358472,0.526633,0.0008267966,0.0001079519,0.0289351,0.00008653582,0.04818966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003124616,0.0003459298,0.1777675,0.00001217748,0.007015085,0.000001917651,0.6760956,0.1158605,0.00004951369,0.01668727,0.002744222,0.0002956615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932264,0.00005976973,0.005979057,0.0001217867,0.00003955695,0.0003570004,0.00002097855,0.000008553398,0.0001868719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990497,0.000188824,0.0004288431,0.00001195295,0.0000481627,0.000006208512,9.958613e-7,0.000002353029,0.000262971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2164996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01643908838932277,"score_gpt":0.3473579329149299,"score_spread":0.3309188445256071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}