{"id":"W2904557932","doi":"","title":"JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: CONTEMPORARY PRESSURES AND APPROPRIATE RESPONSES","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Law; Criticism; Political science; Judicial activism; Supreme court; Judicial review; Government (linguistics); Judicial opinion; Judicial discretion; Citizenship; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01893753,0.000332447,0.0005567741,0.002947901,0.01411081,0.01858315,0.002371664,0.01041283,0.006894318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04587225,0.0004817712,0.0002932031,0.004076602,0.05751581,0.008280916,0.006160172,0.01387749,0.0006904454],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0337269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02504799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1081851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1334184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.96978,0.01018559,0.00113496,0.003352688,0.01014548,0.005401284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747478,0.01258705,0.002270405,0.001199072,0.00656018,0.002635417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007184272,0.000007472999,0.0002731212,0.00002963008,0.000002105132,0.00005940091,0.005357985,0.00004415531,0.00004286966,0.97434,0.01313425,0.006701989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004051075,0.00001934774,0.004109187,0.0005854823,0.00001098937,0.0001545526,0.01981381,0.0001817333,0.0002176772,0.3912866,0.5835325,0.00004753821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03349458,0.02760916,0.002516376,0.3680173,0.002017415,0.00003612529,0.00007323681,0.00004026261,0.5661955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904645,0.01733701,0.0006097534,0.04775593,0.004194268,0.00007821899,0.00004563935,0.00007138497,0.02526287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2447069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07678461801054327,"score_gpt":0.3393280790654607,"score_spread":0.2625434610549174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}