{"id":"W2904656709","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2018.11.002","title":"The finite horizon, undiscounted, durable goods monopoly problem with finitely many consumers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monopoly; Discounting; Durable good; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Horizon; Nash equilibrium; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007513466,0.0002057711,0.0003766374,0.0001208789,0.0002708152,0.001570762,0.0004381965,0.00006953598,0.0001771441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001337554,0.0001243563,0.0001346339,0.0001128898,0.0003117871,0.003384871,0.0001020971,0.0002062666,0.0006951215],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007903432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001212491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006868049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985571,0.000001503432,0.0008334045,0.0001461561,0.0001026708,0.0003591778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983369,0.0002718013,0.000938032,0.0002358624,0.0001724314,0.0000450036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005049139,0.0002001251,0.0008445575,0.0001799623,0.0003676446,0.00001620177,0.00008485976,0.0005568198,0.000009742707,0.9812744,0.005635617,0.01032521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001778536,0.0004495063,0.000209793,0.0002369962,0.000191062,0.0001581643,0.002599917,0.02850322,0.00007237749,0.8204831,0.1447569,0.0005604194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615653,0.00004036009,0.002368324,0.001161814,0.0003477196,0.0001861826,0.000003501046,0.00002250787,0.1343043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946486,0.00008488813,0.002650519,0.0008000372,0.001032114,0.000005556155,0.000002793169,0.00005429026,0.0007211986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1607912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01540717331565566,"score_gpt":0.204786577977549,"score_spread":0.1893794046618934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}