{"id":"W2904850414","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-09969","title":"A Longitudinal Study of Dynamic Risk, Protective Factors, and Criminal Recidivism: Change Over Time and the Impact of Assessment Timing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Risk assessment; Predictive validity; Risk management tools; Dynamic assessment; Psychology; Longitudinal study; Risk factor; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer security; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003416719,0.0002568193,0.0003079485,0.0009396636,0.0009106303,0.0008187559,0.0005230271,0.0005098619,0.0008705744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270158,0.0003099065,0.0003769687,0.0008307287,0.0003384321,0.00110526,0.0007763769,0.001166007,0.0002992401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006299153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009561836,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01651826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02126871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988118,0.0005071155,0.00008779112,0.000174981,0.0002405416,0.0001778656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937743,0.001210549,0.002414192,0.0006825457,0.000912125,0.001006255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002152493,0.0003245901,0.9926404,0.000007541673,0.00003713398,0.00005450893,0.001150099,0.00004231861,0.0001853412,0.00004463836,0.0001102225,0.005187982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000497143,0.0003618173,0.998157,0.000008278866,0.00001916141,0.00008466545,0.0007845816,0.0002557453,0.00006490188,0.00004510907,0.0002065249,0.000007191932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994438,0.00008190304,0.0001300351,0.00004955254,0.000004257338,0.00001305296,0.00008394708,0.000003541568,0.0001898241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991155,0.00006412756,0.0002553441,0.00001576476,0.000005064788,0.0000315394,0.0002021065,0.000002274918,0.0003081175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01651826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03284425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04927010559798538,"score_gpt":0.394548392593138,"score_spread":0.3452782869951526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}