{"id":"W2905117221","doi":"10.29173/alr1430","title":"A Theory of Democratic Adjudication: Towards a Representative, Accountable and Independent Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Accountability; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law; Judicial discretion; Politics; Political science; Commission; Order (exchange); Judicial activism; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007455549,0.00008904918,0.0002988192,0.00001247925,0.0004101416,0.0000144387,0.0001508825,0.00003858059,0.002116306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002472484,0.00007388314,0.00006219538,0.000248429,0.0007783948,0.0001912698,0.00004123624,0.000066926,0.00007302338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002625919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001431041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09352545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01714099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987828,0.0002851906,0.000271844,0.0001894044,0.0003074348,0.0001633404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993191,0.0003012835,0.00009287712,0.0001373807,0.00008366562,0.00006568748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009126514,0.00003622269,0.0007791833,0.00009976594,0.00005432741,0.000001342697,0.0007622369,2.658605e-7,0.00000160042,0.9685134,0.00198032,0.02776227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002640692,0.00004132461,0.009815802,0.002407054,0.0002932518,0.0000085514,0.0005471556,0.000001695221,0.00001736622,0.3319035,0.654443,0.0002572653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005537615,0.1466078,0.0000133917,0.005288358,0.00005048545,0.0004660017,0.000004204107,0.00001404559,0.8420181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.802568,0.191919,0.00005158971,0.003313192,0.00007567568,0.0000647607,0.000003745726,0.000004384477,0.001999703],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02952819031693312,"score_gpt":0.3211134279441268,"score_spread":0.2915852376271937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}