{"id":"W2905117221","doi":"10.29173/alr1430","title":"A Theory of Democratic Adjudication: Towards a Representative, Accountable and Independent Judiciary","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Accountability; Independence (probability theory); Adjudication; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law; Judicial discretion; Politics; Political science; Commission; Order (exchange); Judicial activism; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02556142,0.0004323623,0.0007044533,0.002465858,0.008839422,0.01412876,0.002208064,0.006285531,0.003966703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03028236,0.0005710064,0.0007653874,0.002337699,0.04877428,0.009684955,0.005795791,0.008214423,0.001258669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009450871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01478605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01177924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01148081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9685413,0.01904999,0.000908586,0.002712205,0.005972953,0.002815017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787695,0.01269737,0.00179224,0.002707382,0.002740691,0.001292734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001627894,0.000002786695,0.00005351786,0.000006203857,0.00000136012,0.00001010087,0.0005954262,0.0001830287,0.00001222212,0.996796,0.000898466,0.001439436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001135735,0.000007410154,0.0002060154,0.00003759807,0.000002999626,0.00002478312,0.0002832775,0.0007534334,0.00004520206,0.9677877,0.03083319,0.000006988421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01722296,0.002734806,0.3045823,0.08734194,0.001144814,0.0001909617,0.00007875621,0.0001087344,0.5865949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917763,0.001505817,0.05052982,0.009817419,0.001632992,0.0004055976,0.00007555822,0.000108875,0.0441476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1351833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02952819031693312,"score_gpt":0.3211134279441268,"score_spread":0.2915852376271937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}