{"id":"W2905454201","doi":"10.1007/s10530-018-1890-1","title":"Turning population viability analysis on its head: using stochastic models to evaluate invasive species control strategies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Invasions","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Invasive species; Population; Cost–benefit analysis; Population viability analysis; Population size; Ranking (information retrieval); Control (management); Ecology; Computer science; Machine learning; Endangered species; Artificial intelligence; Demography; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002691756,0.0007583841,0.0006765076,0.0006499069,0.0003141066,0.001015687,0.0009517287,0.001068881,0.001242702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01204404,0.0004469557,0.0007781446,0.0002398085,0.0008539985,0.001054324,0.0007207103,0.0008454875,0.000116566],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001116362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008124421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01252437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008868232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994837,0.0003347268,0.00001386042,0.00005851938,0.00004770341,0.00006152661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914802,0.007034215,0.0006261472,0.0002489112,0.000386396,0.0002240493],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003727225,0.00001651066,0.003220462,0.000008191773,0.00003654604,0.00002327958,0.00001500545,0.9901217,0.0004561048,0.003724423,0.0001426109,0.002197775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002978108,0.00002272935,0.0005458189,0.00000178241,0.000009229072,0.0000051882,0.000008082333,0.9976701,0.000124863,0.001578312,0.00002716834,0.000003767261],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7801748,0.00022819,0.2154291,0.0005056173,0.00005465655,0.00003415518,0.000181131,0.0001637305,0.00322858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952756,0.00004049296,0.004014651,0.00004357875,0.00001245923,0.0000141946,0.00006398084,0.00002414961,0.00051087],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01252437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02490294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3306536329177874,"score_gpt":0.3394873017810497,"score_spread":0.008833668863262256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}