{"id":"W2906364729","doi":"10.1007/s13202-018-0600-y","title":"Estimating reservoir zone from seismic reflection data using maximum-likelihood sparse spike inversion technique: a case study from the Blackfoot field (Alberta, Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Science and Engineering Research Board","keywords":"Seismic inversion; Geology; Seismic to simulation; Inversion (geology); Synthetic seismogram; Seismic trace; Seismology; Reflection (computer programming); Reservoir modeling; Lithology; Acoustic impedance; Electrical impedance; Petrology; Geotechnical engineering; Tectonics; Azimuth; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008924506,0.0001710612,0.0002431044,0.0002809782,0.0005706251,0.00008822494,0.0003971733,0.0001361703,0.0001009549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006154609,0.0001251379,0.00002566108,0.0004176513,0.0001509424,0.0009031994,0.0001052369,0.000555444,0.000003792147],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000425645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002338103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6038406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3141423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983447,0.0002337871,0.0005036234,0.0003937946,0.0003294613,0.0001946055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984041,0.0001624255,0.0005467195,0.0005901348,0.0002273224,0.00006929364],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00130106,0.0002634691,0.2944334,0.00003800248,0.0003043044,0.00084377,0.004219651,0.007991827,0.009335923,0.000004494175,0.05131288,0.6299512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001246994,0.003985968,0.0008996199,0.0003089866,0.0003942948,0.004230835,0.03484951,0.8455219,0.08077209,0.01504885,0.012144,0.0005968979],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304788,0.0001831947,0.05077691,0.01700275,0.001216007,0.0002340357,0.0000181099,0.00006812374,0.00002212285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849424,0.00003988135,0.0137208,0.0005052759,0.0007446008,0.00000205614,0.00002432548,0.000006739227,0.00001389002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8375301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6983728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04998022289888076,"score_gpt":0.2780443423629971,"score_spread":0.2280641194641163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}