{"id":"W2906541749","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2018.12.003","title":"A concentration inequality for inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott point processes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Point processes and geometric inequalities","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Point process; Inequality; Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Applied mathematics; Point (geometry); Convergence (economics); Rate of convergence; Mathematical economics; Mathematical analysis; Calculus (dental); Statistics; Geometry; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001262457,0.0003100974,0.0004435606,0.00008324848,0.0003571488,0.0001406448,0.0002837504,0.0001059379,0.0001300291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00874565,0.0002882844,0.00007661659,0.0004989123,0.0004460369,0.0002289231,0.0000780327,0.000147198,0.00001777729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001756765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002460457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001013823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003235054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997389,0.0001358186,0.0008847516,0.0005567829,0.0004286737,0.0006049697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962263,0.00158385,0.0003790559,0.0005013483,0.001177848,0.0001316022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002314143,0.0004803092,0.001638535,0.006828763,0.0001217202,0.000007708197,0.004801106,0.000002567385,0.003468073,0.9476411,0.03214038,0.002638299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006869684,0.0004301008,0.0001612909,0.00006364909,0.0000820792,0.000008878788,0.00005444612,0.0001566289,0.007546953,0.9882943,0.002118,0.000396712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.273208,0.00002825637,0.7231516,0.001120962,0.0002060228,0.0010604,0.0008457438,0.0001408104,0.0002382128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221195,0.000006577101,0.4750954,0.001647853,0.0005041675,0.0002712087,0.0001906437,0.00004664703,0.0001180038],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2489115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06830294504795546,"score_gpt":0.3316685090873138,"score_spread":0.2633655640393583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}