{"id":"W2906541749","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2018.12.003","title":"A concentration inequality for inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott point processes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics & Probability Letters","topic":"Point processes and geometric inequalities","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Point process; Inequality; Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Applied mathematics; Point (geometry); Convergence (economics); Rate of convergence; Mathematical economics; Mathematical analysis; Calculus (dental); Statistics; Geometry; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005285787,0.001630284,0.001682536,0.0032953,0.001553573,0.003875301,0.002754598,0.002707164,0.006550749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01805728,0.0008040525,0.001641192,0.002550365,0.005582612,0.007291922,0.004251812,0.005562854,0.0009388854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002914877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001216247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002464809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001195157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982526,0.000598251,0.00007594687,0.0003532732,0.0004400725,0.0002799465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985879,0.00990799,0.0008858207,0.0006303192,0.001690975,0.00100593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000360577,0.00001957329,0.0002508073,0.00006187714,0.00002512772,0.0001126529,0.0001090177,0.005291573,0.00192015,0.9879901,0.001236383,0.002946822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002457284,0.00003732225,0.0005748695,0.00003839279,0.00003622637,0.0001983589,0.00005981366,0.1078353,0.001098193,0.8866999,0.003352508,0.000044606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0828288,0.004214457,0.8475696,0.005394184,0.0004522869,0.00006465382,0.0002948,0.0001583837,0.05902268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894877,0.004432451,0.0649377,0.002291259,0.001689304,0.0001777292,0.0004288483,0.0002451019,0.03092065],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006550749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02795422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06830294504795546,"score_gpt":0.3316685090873138,"score_spread":0.2633655640393583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}