{"id":"W2906598090","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.008","title":"An illusion of objectivity in workplace investigation: The cause analysis chart and consistency, accuracy, and bias in judgments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; WorkSafe Victoria","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Illusion; Poison control; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Chart; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Social psychology; Forensic engineering; Applied psychology; Engineering; Statistics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1027146,0.0007019339,0.00180958,0.01013703,0.003207564,0.008217963,0.002328641,0.003256015,0.001814079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3952751,0.001276657,0.002002431,0.003560182,0.02210268,0.01544532,0.005770384,0.005619061,0.0002194621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003395513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005932717,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005039541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003602514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8799192,0.06851176,0.008348793,0.008196532,0.03326061,0.001763196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.430734,0.435263,0.03852969,0.06717598,0.02608191,0.002215338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002000688,0.0003415473,0.2499765,0.0008343864,0.0008814684,0.0005484503,0.04265126,0.008012635,0.005636143,0.4984381,0.005462516,0.1852163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001957786,0.0004897107,0.1148025,0.0006063521,0.0004328751,0.001280665,0.007171175,0.04368792,0.008979293,0.8133454,0.008566577,0.0004417989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4528303,0.003386744,0.48421,0.01471262,0.0007008146,0.000672065,0.0006042091,0.001206744,0.04167639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540386,0.0002076402,0.04408712,0.0005121101,0.0001718118,0.0001812627,0.00006208532,0.0001556061,0.0005838305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1027146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5432131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2974291641818753,"score_gpt":0.5465633798778214,"score_spread":0.2491342156959462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}