{"id":"W2906598090","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.008","title":"An illusion of objectivity in workplace investigation: The cause analysis chart and consistency, accuracy, and bias in judgments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; WorkSafe Victoria","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Illusion; Poison control; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Chart; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Social psychology; Forensic engineering; Applied psychology; Engineering; Statistics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02271363,0.0001035023,0.000445509,0.001205475,0.0007750157,0.00001777868,0.0002676979,0.0001716077,0.0001523928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004064379,0.00006924368,0.00004637587,0.002602586,0.0007763173,0.0003963187,0.0002394882,0.001704861,0.000007462296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000284701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001685089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001810694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009269897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924652,0.004456966,0.001145612,0.0002226264,0.001170508,0.000539088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903234,0.00716207,0.0004096266,0.0003114376,0.001437365,0.0003560809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001852442,0.0001190049,0.9863641,0.0001314187,0.00004931808,0.00001251392,0.005392886,0.00001554903,0.0003413003,0.0002929917,0.0001348046,0.005293712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001275135,0.0006215103,0.9905274,0.0003679796,0.00001809866,0.000007077058,0.004206842,0.001691224,0.00004436168,0.0008657482,0.0003174204,0.00005720651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899053,0.0004923399,0.00002105308,0.008045685,0.00008860897,0.0006931929,0.00001738061,0.000002449533,0.0007339783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972318,0.002088221,0.0001894373,0.0001635092,0.0001838039,0.00001701805,0.000004682462,0.000008699329,0.0001127949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01864925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7872135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2974291641818753,"score_gpt":0.5465633798778214,"score_spread":0.2491342156959462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}