{"id":"W2906867826","doi":"10.1007/s11896-018-9311-z","title":"The Influence of Familiarity Recency and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Judgement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal psychology; Judgement; Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Eyewitness testimony; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001074722,0.00007978212,0.000198954,0.00009735447,0.0001767449,0.00003850753,0.0003109263,0.00008016104,0.00001791846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002103156,0.00005308815,0.00003803936,0.0001590752,0.0003935742,0.0001445998,0.00003913679,0.000221981,0.000008109961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001466249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006840099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003399798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002285978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988264,0.0001750809,0.0003512568,0.000127567,0.0003266584,0.0001930077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987766,0.0004045326,0.0003606117,0.0001438936,0.0002266283,0.00008779789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004334452,0.00135135,0.1295552,0.0005055966,0.0003194486,0.0001078922,0.192559,0.0001614517,0.01546402,0.1711815,0.02390982,0.4605502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006983698,0.001179273,0.9021713,0.0001197519,0.00006714234,0.00005683196,0.01240242,0.000001139678,0.00008632641,0.02316212,0.05992291,0.0001324691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883567,0.0003370255,0.000009309682,0.002435151,0.0003304937,0.000072281,0.000001119867,0.000003089698,0.008454815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960477,0.002322159,0.00007920035,0.000979099,0.000104892,7.587792e-7,5.148273e-8,0.000004343031,0.0004617652],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.772616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2164872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04462723732052665,"score_gpt":0.4203936348206344,"score_spread":0.3757663975001077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}