{"id":"W2906867826","doi":"10.1007/s11896-018-9311-z","title":"The Influence of Familiarity Recency and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Judgement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal psychology; Judgement; Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Eyewitness testimony; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248749,0.0002386461,0.0004269406,0.0004380356,0.0004920238,0.00148814,0.0003780835,0.0008944154,0.007290506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04998307,0.0002347819,0.0003523036,0.0002664817,0.0005910232,0.000815065,0.0005973394,0.0008679235,0.0006511891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004956937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006293938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003363491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005105851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986362,0.0005359026,0.0001458568,0.0002397763,0.0002560487,0.0001862061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273655,0.05992619,0.006085645,0.0020005,0.002248442,0.002373658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04105011,0.0025896,0.8149945,0.000174891,0.0004859328,0.001999046,0.006185905,0.001376955,0.09474393,0.000550769,0.0006500122,0.03519832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000594548,0.0009010718,0.9937987,0.00001573834,0.00009763004,0.0003156728,0.0006190549,0.001021466,0.002805223,0.0001779649,0.0001642919,0.00002370404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00006222106,0.00005825457,0.0000197899,0.0000095117,0.000004230726,0.0000146272,0.000002339459,0.0007873218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994561,0.00002551717,0.00005997242,0.00001250095,0.00001305622,0.000003467987,0.00001586944,0.000004704984,0.0004087051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007290506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02438921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04462723732052665,"score_gpt":0.4203936348206344,"score_spread":0.3757663975001077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}