{"id":"W2906978576","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2018.12.005","title":"The effects of distractor set-size on neural tracking of attended speech","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brain and Language","topic":"EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Distraction; Speech recognition; Perception; Speech perception; Neurocomputational speech processing; Electroencephalography; Stimulus (psychology); Entrainment (biomusicology); Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Active listening; Communication; Computer science; Neuroscience; Acoustics; Rhythm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008312354,0.0006973895,0.0007266437,0.0003612288,0.0003032188,0.001004506,0.0005309716,0.0007666459,0.005258453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02833079,0.0005843574,0.000419342,0.0003288763,0.0005285703,0.001070725,0.0008886585,0.001029717,0.0007142543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004435769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000462557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001409694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001708024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993856,0.0001262588,0.00008641227,0.0001503105,0.0001849648,0.00006642882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824803,0.01562303,0.0004665025,0.0005631956,0.0003509956,0.0005159585],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01436409,0.0003663878,0.003220396,0.0003319102,0.0001107995,0.0002540288,0.0003055636,0.001202339,0.960662,0.0002775298,0.0002171388,0.01868781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001423329,0.006827437,0.4909517,0.00017442,0.0009579741,0.002549239,0.000364653,0.0356992,0.4561194,0.002810938,0.001959283,0.0001624273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.992006,0.0005633844,0.003940262,0.0001037353,0.0002145646,0.00007565763,0.000451798,0.0001150843,0.002529645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946398,0.0003463346,0.002772223,0.0001468249,0.00008551529,0.0001034445,0.000389814,0.0002576289,0.001258516],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005258453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01759124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01143622261818593,"score_gpt":0.2700268798815532,"score_spread":0.2585906572633672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}