{"id":"W2907494056","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2018-0438","title":"Comparison of different approaches for determining the residual post-cracking strength index of fiber reinforced concrete for bridges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Beekeepers' Association; Tetra Tech (Canada); University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Structural engineering; Cracking; Deflection (physics); Deck; Bridge deck; Residual; Flexural strength; Residual strength; Materials science; Engineering; Composite material; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003945555,0.001672384,0.0007592374,0.008076388,0.0005818126,0.001149038,0.001916348,0.0006827143,0.0005841586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003795357,0.0005934977,0.001115971,0.003059989,0.0007515617,0.0008634573,0.001022975,0.0007249038,0.0003485373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002415485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00172951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07019082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2324076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9925168,0.0006277138,0.0003381049,0.000799936,0.005480599,0.0002367808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964817,0.0003857918,0.0004624258,0.000216574,0.002328175,0.0001253485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009597282,0.0005091839,0.178106,0.002320251,0.001012238,0.0004102382,0.002842495,0.01838922,0.4093919,0.001798564,0.001133604,0.3831266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005821663,0.002756919,0.4006089,0.0004934586,0.0009046276,0.001173869,0.002197472,0.05532992,0.5237347,0.0006674483,0.01151567,0.0005589044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.874903,0.01104591,0.09599701,0.0001088465,0.000128195,0.0005471414,0.001366453,0.000704021,0.01519947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.796435,0.005844797,0.1918334,0.00007252846,0.00002253036,0.0002493593,0.001346649,0.0001728158,0.004022886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07019082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1395645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02276033414767624,"score_gpt":0.2307520272462397,"score_spread":0.2079916930985635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}