{"id":"W2907672252","doi":"10.1080/03075079.2018.1564258","title":"Cheaters on Twitter: an analysis of engagement approaches of contract cheating services","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Outreach; Misconduct; Higher education; Academic integrity; Exploratory research; Subject (documents); Competition (biology); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005182458,0.0003552061,0.0005457935,0.004247071,0.004379853,0.004117329,0.0008571812,0.001319071,0.004710131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03063378,0.0002582097,0.0003444226,0.004811469,0.002406051,0.004538563,0.004802557,0.001697271,0.001398138],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002181471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001757626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007669899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01105739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912941,0.005006946,0.0004083406,0.000484396,0.00178752,0.001018876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678116,0.02115274,0.004494299,0.001622744,0.003160115,0.001758416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003781725,0.0001950906,0.2051336,0.0003914073,0.00004209646,0.001163339,0.7008712,0.0002054293,0.003400967,0.005272624,0.003434241,0.07951186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001333872,0.0001700361,0.218931,0.0002958614,0.00002834422,0.0006785766,0.7361656,0.002405458,0.001257353,0.00181053,0.03816433,0.00007953283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826784,0.0002557266,0.001905821,0.0009472498,0.00002491461,0.0001421625,0.0004227972,0.00003342629,0.01358958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940771,0.0002492649,0.001173404,0.0002226583,0.00003362378,0.0001953724,0.0003525771,0.00005185907,0.003644083],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02740782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1761263720992214,"score_gpt":0.4121821667997601,"score_spread":0.2360557947005386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}