{"id":"W2907924306","doi":"10.5267/j.esm.2018.10.002","title":"A method for determination of equivalent limit load surface of fiber-reinforced nonlinear composites","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Solid Mechanics","topic":"Material Properties and Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Nonlinear system; Fiber; Limit (mathematics); Fiber-reinforced composite; Limit load; Structural engineering; Surface (topology); Finite element method; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003744872,0.000101556,0.0002158776,0.00002801558,0.0000393645,0.00001585745,0.00018217,0.00005618627,0.0001189138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007488023,0.00009449332,0.00005510445,0.00007699798,0.00001404378,0.00006231773,0.00006861295,0.00002586559,0.00001585162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002904036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000308301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002442477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001158893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992129,0.00001097781,0.0003254217,0.0001407622,0.0001442494,0.0001656596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992662,0.00007625586,0.0001423013,0.0002173596,0.0002609841,0.00003691444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002708672,0.00001342664,4.878944e-8,0.0001819362,0.0000043738,5.049142e-8,0.0001462919,0.01324627,0.9828504,0.003012573,0.00002094094,0.0004965916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001096749,0.0001251712,3.497848e-7,0.00003282504,0.00001152901,8.421938e-7,0.000006878146,0.4373741,0.560451,0.0000521261,0.001778788,0.00005673642],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1753826,0.00002527346,0.8238665,0.00003993692,0.0002251879,0.0003004421,0.00007210688,0.0000512167,0.00003678366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4731071,0.000005001566,0.5265713,0.000009195988,0.00008716495,0.00002099693,0.000007705781,0.00001893558,0.0001726286],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4241278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3853326,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02032368403101845,"score_gpt":0.2823223296622378,"score_spread":0.2619986456312193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}