{"id":"W2908407460","doi":"10.1002/ieam.4119","title":"Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Credibility; Transparency (behavior); Scientific integrity; Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Rigour; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Epistemology; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0839479,0.001062839,0.003062868,0.01165248,0.00259401,0.01142824,0.003417297,0.009699577,0.003097981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1690898,0.0008101877,0.00220032,0.01085528,0.01304366,0.01410506,0.005970896,0.008492323,0.001379131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007675261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03056159,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004305941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00537909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9067118,0.05140492,0.01214936,0.003207486,0.02489567,0.00163081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6737217,0.2467704,0.02553786,0.009813596,0.04059332,0.00356316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007527904,0.00007344471,0.0009550788,0.07093436,0.0004965034,0.0003377534,0.002409066,0.0004754479,0.0007986035,0.08215611,0.0439385,0.7973498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003198077,0.0001221954,0.001943423,0.07931971,0.0005168152,0.001066171,0.001270699,0.0003266614,0.001364959,0.06510347,0.8488236,0.0001103318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002103683,0.9692472,0.001745866,0.02380486,0.001596006,0.00005528605,0.00002544528,0.00002334373,0.003291542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009389121,0.9742605,0.004618878,0.007670239,0.002660569,0.0001409299,0.00006202125,0.00002300731,0.001174758],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4439642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1077068157427161,"score_gpt":0.4216945087595341,"score_spread":0.313987693016818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}