{"id":"W2909024958","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2018-0457","title":"Numerical analysis of pipeline response to slow landslides: case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landslide; Pipeline transport; Geotechnical engineering; Pipeline (software); Geology; Finite element method; Stiffness; Instrumentation (computer programming); Numerical analysis; Engineering; Structural engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006548731,0.0002212671,0.0005504095,0.001256203,0.00007528514,0.00006260953,0.0003438905,0.0001890429,0.0002831738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002449715,0.0002031326,0.0002466485,0.001669522,0.0000200258,0.00006316852,0.0000242241,0.0007560041,0.00002880155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002925607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001404546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00677029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003430344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983554,0.00007713625,0.0005485623,0.0002195904,0.0002883021,0.0005110106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981499,0.0001863552,0.00004261799,0.0004715185,0.00009635277,0.001053214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004617568,0.00002483309,0.0007597303,0.000008174818,0.0003263126,0.001897883,0.0001073643,0.9935998,0.0004769202,0.00001348029,0.001088388,0.001650913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001153366,0.0008069017,0.03089279,0.00005207298,0.0008061843,0.006087572,0.001041279,0.9334479,0.0001009479,0.0000785451,0.02472787,0.0008045568],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592591,0.00008694996,0.03952362,0.000264369,0.000285652,0.0002448596,0.00002831677,0.0001545171,0.0001526343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999159,0.000004154172,0.0004777152,0.0001217369,0.00006374946,0.000006112809,0.000002664208,0.00003495494,0.000129857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0601519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007134345123688613,"score_gpt":0.2233553163104845,"score_spread":0.2162209711867959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}