{"id":"W2909024958","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2018-0457","title":"Numerical analysis of pipeline response to slow landslides: case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landslide; Pipeline transport; Geotechnical engineering; Pipeline (software); Geology; Finite element method; Stiffness; Instrumentation (computer programming); Numerical analysis; Engineering; Structural engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003293203,0.0004467329,0.0004135949,0.0006388072,0.0006246298,0.0005902222,0.0005369206,0.001103635,0.001753865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007963963,0.0002807193,0.0004510341,0.0007368813,0.0007999967,0.0002382796,0.0004888267,0.0003448894,0.0002076699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008945718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009777751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0255366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0285261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998626,0.00002085298,0.000008079626,0.00002051057,0.00004724597,0.00004078672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996171,0.0001703901,0.00005970517,0.00003512119,0.00008842511,0.00002926453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771374,0.0001406068,0.01892662,0.0001085852,0.00003013612,0.001296027,0.0002999069,0.9460483,0.02641402,0.001011094,0.0004976056,0.005049987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002388062,0.0002725028,0.01187738,0.00001354735,0.00001877309,0.000207001,0.00061988,0.9783279,0.007284841,0.000354156,0.0009794484,0.00002071162],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910235,0.00005509924,0.00535896,0.0001038455,0.000007854394,0.00003482185,0.0001570482,0.00007041012,0.003188506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996254,0.00005730571,0.002424608,0.000008171707,0.00000177545,0.00001615377,0.00006282419,0.000008333014,0.001166729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0255366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05077589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007134345123688613,"score_gpt":0.2233553163104845,"score_spread":0.2162209711867959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}