{"id":"W2909027567","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.017","title":"Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 3: Risk assessment of carcinogenic potential based on the current state of knowledge of carcinogenesis in humans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; National Institutes of Health; Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology; European Food Safety Authority; World Health Organization; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Carcinogen; Carcinogenesis; Bioassay; In silico; Risk assessment; Toxicology; Cancer; Computational biology; Biology; Computer science; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281528,0.0006064982,0.002347222,0.0004067083,0.00007144933,0.000004410266,0.0005884512,0.0005439622,0.00008387027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004411455,0.0004818429,0.0008646623,0.0003646038,0.0006904539,0.00000423243,0.0004031319,0.0007577873,0.000001466587],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001454635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001364264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001831778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003001884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949812,0.00195684,0.001453741,0.0008794171,0.0002372074,0.0004915899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970818,0.0003697197,0.001372079,0.0008169326,0.0002395049,0.0001200233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007820319,0.003021526,0.0146751,0.03456327,0.002301339,0.00001556104,0.0001714842,0.001355718,0.5744817,0.0002611754,0.0009968898,0.3673742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01202086,0.007098331,0.1302445,0.006126256,0.01757145,0.00008642773,0.0000568208,0.004239264,0.5317965,0.0001927634,0.2867364,0.003830469],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4642942,0.5335649,0.0000390979,0.00001115275,0.0003034048,0.001184305,0.00054908,0.000003441163,0.00005040677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5617515,0.437833,0.00002892246,0.00002773468,0.00008555575,0.00009342008,0.0001294571,0.00003521354,0.00001518781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3635438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02895592744735011,"score_gpt":0.3550283617986311,"score_spread":0.326072434351281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}