{"id":"W2909156091","doi":"10.2514/6.2019-2116","title":"Viscous-Inviscid Analysis of Transonic Swept Wings using 2.5D RANS and Parametric Shapes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"University of Patras","keywords":"Transonic; Inviscid flow; Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations; Parametric statistics; Wing; Swept wing; Mechanics; Aerospace engineering; Computer science; Computational fluid dynamics; Physics; Geology; Aerodynamics; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002455125,0.0004913765,0.0004236614,0.0004026986,0.0003547653,0.0008552709,0.0006217515,0.0008585394,0.002043136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008355085,0.0003416263,0.0006296479,0.0002413648,0.0005544104,0.0006094926,0.000799696,0.0005234131,0.0004325647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002984907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005140969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004701122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003677693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99988,0.00002307837,0.000007204099,0.00001410887,0.00005078338,0.00002495538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.0000756452,0.00003108451,0.00003773388,0.00005525366,0.00002747081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000187697,0.00008839531,0.0028091,0.00007506915,0.00003321844,0.0006518291,0.0001517985,0.951135,0.02690899,0.004963796,0.0008179894,0.01217721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006568181,0.00002024173,0.00114782,0.000004846367,0.000001937448,0.00002975103,0.00002729189,0.9971124,0.001130432,0.0002774369,0.0002329228,0.000008376806],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8519542,0.0004680447,0.1163876,0.0003029439,0.0001122085,0.00008208836,0.000484,0.0006602983,0.02954857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859315,0.00009642226,0.009397166,0.00003565981,0.00001664364,0.00001617758,0.0001689545,0.0001048104,0.004232665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004701122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009347498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005782399578193416,"score_gpt":0.2108287863170623,"score_spread":0.2050463867388689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}