{"id":"W2909204097","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.027","title":"Flame retardants in urban air: A case study in Toronto targeting distinct source sectors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Health Canada; University of Toronto; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Clean Air Regulatory Agenda","keywords":"Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Environmental science; Volatilisation; Environmental chemistry; Passive sampling; Dominance (genetics); Organophosphate; Fire retardant; Pollutant; Pesticide; Chemistry; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001751063,0.0003699338,0.0001121987,0.0004773499,0.001608754,0.000534579,0.0002841365,0.0004610221,0.001128219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002591417,0.0001446876,0.0002383128,0.001168975,0.0004422885,0.0001399104,0.0004153738,0.000174727,0.0001522746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005931443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8056744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9235114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997738,0.00003987968,0.000009418,0.00003164469,0.00006202705,0.00008324394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999849,0.00002698103,0.00003197537,0.000007919671,0.00004474859,0.00003952102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041558,0.000473048,0.9030046,0.0004605373,0.0001063338,0.02959434,0.01393739,0.004424064,0.01956389,0.0006522885,0.001285441,0.0260825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001776545,0.0004780882,0.9673389,0.00002888833,0.00006914365,0.002068634,0.02209479,0.002267849,0.002926782,0.00007387751,0.002613982,0.00002131551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982931,0.0001329373,0.000151422,0.00002878387,0.000002098948,0.00003522807,0.0002320731,0.000003927463,0.001120414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980597,0.0002434232,0.0002541081,0.0000152782,0.000002631506,0.000009295395,0.000165445,0.000001755102,0.00124841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1943256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3909401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005013780366349202,"score_gpt":0.2163081669180315,"score_spread":0.2112943865516823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}