{"id":"W2909204097","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.027","title":"Flame retardants in urban air: A case study in Toronto targeting distinct source sectors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Health Canada; University of Toronto; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Clean Air Regulatory Agenda","keywords":"Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Environmental science; Volatilisation; Environmental chemistry; Passive sampling; Dominance (genetics); Organophosphate; Fire retardant; Pollutant; Pesticide; Chemistry; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005890758,0.0003135088,0.0002899475,0.00005874548,0.00009383154,0.00001864592,0.0002334324,0.0001114994,0.006736541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003646967,0.0003167228,0.00006659239,0.0002039815,0.0001202058,0.0006528122,0.0003117883,0.0002722789,0.001149583],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005503524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001049742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0150034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02232521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974505,0.0002484153,0.0004919752,0.0006666218,0.0004866392,0.0006558003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992377,0.00003202244,0.0001374576,0.0004271444,1.405138e-7,0.0001655436],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004679057,0.0005670396,0.9509083,0.000002126867,0.000009045742,0.0005491416,0.00472793,0.0005196243,0.03412296,3.333865e-7,0.00006088062,0.00848581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001528554,0.0002631198,0.9816315,0.00001378712,0.00001036313,0.0002328585,0.0136671,0.001254348,0.0007508523,0.000007098834,0.0002664177,0.0003740674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970751,0.00009953263,0.00001748981,0.00004108085,0.0002109188,0.0009384936,0.00004324721,0.00005414432,0.001519965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999008,0.00000557919,0.00006243693,0.00008707514,0.00005071655,0.00001270042,0.000004173477,0.00004829492,0.0007210021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0333721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005013780366349202,"score_gpt":0.2163081669180315,"score_spread":0.2112943865516823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}