{"id":"W2909315333","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.05","title":"Reflexive Accounts: An Intersectional Approach to Exploring the Fluidity of Insider/Outsider Status and the Researcher’s Impact on Culturally Sensitive Post-Positivist Qualitative Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Insider; Sociology; Qualitative research; Positivism; Gender studies; Photovoice; Epistemology; Intersectionality; Anthropology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1895027,0.0003535626,0.0009977955,0.0002102343,0.002336752,0.00009561964,0.0005702351,0.0002107365,0.00006520301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0658164,0.000179614,0.0003283013,0.001057662,0.02029199,0.0009514255,0.0003453457,0.002407611,0.0000553065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007641411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008244601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008869238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003397079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7941692,0.2015236,0.0007308838,0.0005630307,0.001676061,0.001337135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9168071,0.07686443,0.0003619011,0.000527259,0.004812221,0.0006271012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004754352,0.0001147681,0.00003055636,0.0002041224,0.000221429,4.600451e-7,0.6393619,7.616171e-7,0.0001014644,0.3566133,0.001010791,0.001864973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004497149,0.000836299,0.004747283,0.0006377593,0.00004169239,0.000002375944,0.9426543,0.000003748979,0.00004026221,0.04798247,0.002360722,0.0002434386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.857749,0.02896546,0.001810588,0.08632177,0.0003205016,0.005801281,0.0006017214,0.00006744684,0.01836227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728212,0.01979263,0.00234266,0.003426354,0.0004079637,0.0008552531,0.0000676038,0.00003514215,0.0002512034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3086308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7228493771662337,"score_gpt":0.6933209362589433,"score_spread":0.02952844090729034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}