{"id":"W2909353903","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.10.024","title":"Superior Risk Stratification With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Comprehensive Atherosclerotic Risk Score","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","topic":"Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Medicine; Coronary artery disease; Stenosis; Internal medicine; Computed tomography angiography; Angiography; Radiology; Cardiology; Hazard ratio; Myocardial infarction; Coronary angiography; Risk stratification; Proportional hazards model; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003046901,0.0008001659,0.001106092,0.001040379,0.0003239379,0.001735974,0.0003940144,0.001023293,0.002778831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01199445,0.0002485155,0.0007781153,0.0006991702,0.0003346922,0.0009695654,0.0008487898,0.0008425857,0.0006950652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003396586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006418549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001032366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002370043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977718,0.0009053509,0.0001980513,0.0003466177,0.0005936644,0.0001845499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947345,0.002592719,0.0005928153,0.0006572583,0.0006895941,0.0007331215],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00348804,0.0002293354,0.9442387,0.00005789412,0.0007524354,0.0002092125,0.00009165288,0.00107814,0.001855198,0.0005026973,0.001265793,0.04623092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002899503,0.001477864,0.9723704,0.00008042819,0.00129979,0.0008889243,0.0001505897,0.01750625,0.0008028101,0.003243447,0.001832544,0.00005708653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806952,0.003991972,0.003315551,0.001516272,0.0002502149,0.00006167284,0.000479038,0.00008299779,0.009606996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997045,0.0003750777,0.001307247,0.0002094518,0.0003182696,0.000009544215,0.000296734,0.00001178373,0.0004268808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003046901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01611376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01343364677150882,"score_gpt":0.2264122221001943,"score_spread":0.2129785753286854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}