{"id":"W2909625626","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-07-2017-3013","title":"To speak or not to speak the language of numbers: accounting as ventriloquism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Accounting; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Accounting research; Originality; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Audit; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Creative accounting; Accounting information system; Economics; Social science; History; Aesthetics; Computer science; Mathematics; Qualitative research; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006842375,0.0007900771,0.0009574692,0.0009332455,0.001202426,0.002699925,0.002416505,0.0002167039,0.004575341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006461046,0.0006039942,0.0004058859,0.00317379,0.0001404974,0.003354954,0.00172283,0.001082588,0.00700246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004240539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002731338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003046538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004645469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929738,0.00008716988,0.00196439,0.001122115,0.002368548,0.001483952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937361,0.0008395505,0.002122727,0.001344504,0.001840388,0.0001166843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002113498,0.0009447876,0.8572581,0.002010883,0.0007299097,0.0001589583,0.008338192,0.008921584,0.01659952,0.008028613,0.06545618,0.02943979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004805304,0.0003281729,0.5719147,0.003208931,0.0009695149,0.0005287135,0.06765636,0.002825443,0.003093803,0.003703143,0.3366699,0.00429604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781413,0.00005633139,0.0004728411,0.00625489,0.002670955,0.001364787,0.00001649275,0.0003016871,0.01072073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698413,0.000007591127,0.001182802,0.02039393,0.007199561,0.0000258857,0.0000256883,0.0001891774,0.001134075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2853434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01160636489550641,"score_gpt":0.2644642952564512,"score_spread":0.2528579303609447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}