{"id":"W2909834170","doi":"10.3221/igf-esis.47.22","title":"Comparison of tensile strength and fracture toughness under mode I and II loading of co-cured and co-bonded CFRP joints","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalsa Corporation","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Carbon fiber reinforced polymer; Ultimate tensile strength; Durability; Composite number; Curing (chemistry); Adhesive; Toughness; Fracture toughness; Bonding strength; Adhesive bonding; Drill; Metallurgy; Layer (electronics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005798228,0.0005380866,0.0003051001,0.0007600308,0.0002461655,0.000217125,0.0002930933,0.0006276111,0.002481058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007453216,0.0003015904,0.0003305915,0.0004630708,0.0003660588,0.0004159071,0.0001833267,0.0005097181,0.0004636472],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001118368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001361964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007426844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002165645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999343,0.00004489522,0.00004325411,0.000106803,0.0003706598,0.00009146509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984934,0.0004112874,0.000320418,0.0000882278,0.0005726711,0.000113924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002893768,0.00003755645,0.001191409,0.0001352878,0.00001400105,0.0001009734,0.0001354909,0.0006137608,0.9921625,0.00004582165,0.0001032636,0.005170512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008445989,0.001221948,0.04111659,0.00002735477,0.00005863282,0.0002390938,0.0003393794,0.003019516,0.9524566,0.0000554344,0.001421926,0.00003515439],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949415,0.0009444455,0.002177358,0.0000198791,0.00003957237,0.0000156177,0.0002146519,0.0000561493,0.001590662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952793,0.0003093134,0.001603776,0.00001846881,0.000009735219,0.00002489111,0.0002301877,0.00002297339,0.002501466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002481058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008300006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02065951597109159,"score_gpt":0.3087852470632396,"score_spread":0.288125731092148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}