{"id":"W2909834170","doi":"10.3221/igf-esis.47.22","title":"Comparison of tensile strength and fracture toughness under mode I and II loading of co-cured and co-bonded CFRP joints","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalsa Corporation","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Carbon fiber reinforced polymer; Ultimate tensile strength; Durability; Composite number; Curing (chemistry); Adhesive; Toughness; Fracture toughness; Bonding strength; Adhesive bonding; Drill; Metallurgy; Layer (electronics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009130588,0.0003256517,0.0007089434,0.0001154649,0.00012412,0.00005031389,0.0001628028,0.0002792388,0.0001853624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005813676,0.0002740903,0.00005205347,0.0001251618,0.0002832871,0.0002283767,0.00008904265,0.0004705017,0.000002814672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002988376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001411201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004823352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002452134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985627,0.00004108984,0.0005256417,0.0003228871,0.0002526497,0.0002950121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990347,0.0001921568,0.0001451344,0.0002932208,0.0001681039,0.0001666856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008109805,0.00008929249,0.010487,0.0002738992,0.0001337988,0.00000242798,0.002048291,0.0001319957,0.977809,0.0007419651,0.005978355,0.002222923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008888882,0.0004292402,0.02118989,0.0002593113,0.00009193388,0.0000215559,0.0009289123,0.02135605,0.9530696,0.0005373313,0.000829553,0.0003977636],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971818,0.001035919,0.0006364749,0.0001030099,0.0002058524,0.0002418287,0.0001222122,0.0001026329,0.0003702496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971018,0.00005237146,0.002586041,0.0000381119,0.00009294361,0.00000622765,0.00004502841,0.00003668317,0.00004072484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02473938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02065951597109159,"score_gpt":0.3087852470632396,"score_spread":0.288125731092148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}