{"id":"W2909880899","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i2.61745","title":"Community-Academic Peer Review: Prospects for Strengthening Community-Campus Engagement and Enriching Scholarship","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Engaged scholarship; Scholarship; General partnership; Accountability; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Community engagement; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Peer review; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9445006,0.000705938,0.001058451,0.001132061,0.6940792,0.003138157,0.00333711,0.0005736348,0.0001356604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7547074,0.0007222475,0.0002918027,0.000962384,0.0007338532,0.002356228,0.002486577,0.8362384,0.0000487866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006907717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004513094,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004938894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005812673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.168707,0.825387,0.001057347,0.0003979679,0.002706214,0.001744466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6501153,0.3453272,0.000632878,0.001417268,0.001617329,0.0008900355],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001375858,0.0004041927,0.008170011,0.001260175,0.0002624472,0.000008562651,0.9274749,0.0002431664,0.00274792,0.0006999635,0.001128701,0.05746235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00169952,0.0008861313,0.004450333,0.00438572,0.00009638644,0.00005871667,0.7700647,0.0001511356,0.00003007951,0.0009318753,0.2166251,0.0006202387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720474,0.00831114,0.000352132,0.004548067,0.0004333534,0.001808496,0.000007417739,0.0004719635,0.01201996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788933,0.007646519,0.004647114,0.00105371,0.0004056937,0.0001190695,0.0001014211,0.0001776423,0.006955495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8356647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995229,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.216327502744278,"score_gpt":0.4416238677097677,"score_spread":0.2252963649654898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}