{"id":"W2909889257","doi":"10.1002/ecy.2595","title":"Assessing the effect of density on population growth when modeling individual encounter data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Density dependence; Population density; Population; Statistics; Variance (accounting); Population size; Econometrics; Population model; Ecology; Density estimation; Population growth; Statistical physics; Vital rates; Population ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Physics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004661554,0.0005578299,0.0006391865,0.0005895247,0.0004267126,0.0008843127,0.001745998,0.001208565,0.00136332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02079034,0.0004521094,0.001016939,0.0005962092,0.0008752701,0.001712604,0.0009444341,0.001120559,0.0002276714],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000849986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008835277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0129347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01328478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984579,0.0009427279,0.00008177137,0.0002449484,0.0001880508,0.00008455072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891422,0.008711833,0.0008059214,0.0009342061,0.000320354,0.00008546574],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006172768,0.00008518997,0.03489492,0.0001082334,0.000118594,0.0001253666,0.0001933979,0.9166201,0.002782172,0.02977494,0.0004217459,0.01481372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005188899,0.00004588842,0.004106398,0.00001073953,0.00002314361,0.00005880839,0.00002762905,0.9884687,0.0006564931,0.006141156,0.000442671,0.0000132288],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3197873,0.0002540455,0.6737375,0.0005487006,0.00004414956,0.000190409,0.00107806,0.0003128078,0.004047159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345749,0.0001763052,0.06257693,0.0001441313,0.00002141242,0.0002273195,0.0005206171,0.0000626296,0.001695749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02571881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02468290669710643,"score_gpt":0.2689405484339665,"score_spread":0.2442576417368601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}