{"id":"W2910500353","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.2567","title":"Evaluating the popularity of R in ecology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Center For Environmental Assessment; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Popularity; Scripting language; Ecology; Field (mathematics); Workflow; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Biology; Mathematics; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2337979,0.001387416,0.001558081,0.01442103,0.001506156,0.007672269,0.003740046,0.002015671,0.005755526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6673244,0.001099024,0.002839709,0.02222466,0.005323245,0.008747344,0.005303321,0.00326065,0.00447848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001720151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003411785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00223871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00275636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7167426,0.1941123,0.01854841,0.02555841,0.04298111,0.002057198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1314818,0.7585961,0.02854809,0.04412153,0.03442081,0.002831666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002366682,0.0003029453,0.4093616,0.009525396,0.005951148,0.001138359,0.004379084,0.0174548,0.004401532,0.04347289,0.0736987,0.4279469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008170273,0.00272819,0.3351801,0.0089833,0.00451175,0.007124681,0.005877861,0.1764584,0.0136457,0.08723623,0.3566435,0.0007933603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3756412,0.05880402,0.4360626,0.04469211,0.003016832,0.0008602683,0.0196126,0.01790371,0.04340662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7434615,0.006901709,0.2264204,0.003259653,0.001330528,0.001045919,0.005223791,0.01025354,0.002102931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9448636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04558260564761931,"score_gpt":0.3157480880982247,"score_spread":0.2701654824506054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}