{"id":"W2910610030","doi":"10.4208/cicp.2008.v4.p195","title":"Lipschitz and Total-Variational Regularization for Blind Deconvolution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Computational Physics","topic":"Advanced Image Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Regularization (linguistics); Deconvolution; Lipschitz continuity; Blind deconvolution; Mathematics; Point spread function; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Algorithm; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00268983,0.001149747,0.0009804645,0.0007685624,0.0005073485,0.001053656,0.001304222,0.002227958,0.001391436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004993506,0.0005595245,0.0011775,0.0005186964,0.002053779,0.001863969,0.001583549,0.001938497,0.0004712552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009940161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002062724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00171139,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991512,0.0003336859,0.00004079321,0.0001626567,0.0002526622,0.00005909976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988456,0.0005780684,0.00008431842,0.0001596599,0.0002747804,0.00005753922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002484613,0.00005364397,0.0005377266,0.0003881116,0.0002041931,0.0001674035,0.0001884127,0.305415,0.03074234,0.5552436,0.004942643,0.1018685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009310991,0.00002707257,0.0001248965,0.00001398977,0.00001911855,0.00007048008,0.000009251219,0.930679,0.004477616,0.06207237,0.002470728,0.0000262238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002995204,0.0004672549,0.9948645,0.0002293517,0.00003862663,0.00001505672,0.00002702871,0.00007508599,0.001287901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2855563,0.002013315,0.6975479,0.0005484431,0.0002652482,0.0001956276,0.0003099945,0.0003252347,0.01323794],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00268983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0142253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06465865481866599,"score_gpt":0.3375472305564713,"score_spread":0.2728885757378053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}