{"id":"W2910756861","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0332","title":"Prediction of diameter distributions and tree-lists in southwestern Oregon using LiDAR and stand-level auxiliary information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metric (unit); Tree (set theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Random forest; Lidar; Statistics; Forest inventory; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Computer science; Forest management; Artificial intelligence; Remote sensing; Forestry; Geography; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751432,0.00004903598,0.00009318121,0.0002484969,0.00009446296,0.00005346744,0.00007927315,0.00005134336,0.00003837225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001054131,0.00004386227,0.00001780101,0.0002714595,0.0002477643,0.0003872372,0.00002476987,0.0002120705,0.000007499853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002376066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000213146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01494622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0532757,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.00007206714,0.0002359404,0.00007065168,0.000225465,0.0001935608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994527,0.00006879072,0.00007686902,0.0001050011,0.00005797354,0.0002387233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001439743,0.000006406729,0.9881698,0.00001554981,0.000004078477,0.000003215261,0.0008133463,0.0002318886,0.0009423016,0.00007473741,0.0001292603,0.009594958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002664893,0.00008082806,0.9948481,0.00007245009,0.00000378001,0.00005067105,0.0002909195,0.002008273,0.0001359181,0.000371244,0.001835015,0.00003626522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981127,0.00005272836,0.0007393711,0.0001718922,0.00002979922,0.0001335387,0.00008989509,0.000001016671,0.0006690765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993679,0.00002050712,0.0005318988,0.000005224068,0.00001357566,3.444857e-7,0.000007887726,0.000003586264,0.00004909152],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03832948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05042885908014297,"score_gpt":0.2795489778932478,"score_spread":0.2291201188131049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}