{"id":"W2910756861","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0332","title":"Prediction of diameter distributions and tree-lists in southwestern Oregon using LiDAR and stand-level auxiliary information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metric (unit); Tree (set theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Random forest; Lidar; Statistics; Forest inventory; Mathematics; Multivariate statistics; Computer science; Forest management; Artificial intelligence; Remote sensing; Forestry; Geography; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000536874,0.0002336301,0.0001784368,0.0005261786,0.0003797238,0.0006609821,0.000456779,0.0002599013,0.001172979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001487872,0.0001778457,0.0002242143,0.0006469245,0.0001850069,0.0008384199,0.0004047328,0.0002876609,0.0002663778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001161476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1492739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4030109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998527,0.00002617047,0.00001517946,0.0000470526,0.00003746902,0.00002158177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992563,0.0003027651,0.0001281607,0.00005895173,0.000189461,0.00006432698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001659637,0.0001306603,0.9555632,0.0000243042,0.0000390772,0.0001065771,0.0001836651,0.01646309,0.002361253,0.0001734901,0.0004004739,0.02438816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002081055,0.00006736183,0.8096437,0.00002509048,0.00002982776,0.00007556906,0.0009437876,0.1861906,0.001588207,0.0004011596,0.0009899009,0.00002393973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976767,0.00002760233,0.0009735547,0.00003180141,0.000001879416,0.0000079007,0.000697425,0.00003927912,0.0005438956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949774,0.00004656849,0.002883255,0.000007386089,0.000002322829,0.00001030972,0.001594991,0.000008945593,0.000468771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1492739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05042885908014297,"score_gpt":0.2795489778932478,"score_spread":0.2291201188131049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}