{"id":"W2910948534","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i2.61748","title":"Learning to “Walk the Talk”: Reflexive Evaluation in Community-First Engaged Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Introspection; Participatory evaluation; Sociology; Accountability; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Community building; Community engagement; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Corporate governance; Political science; Psychology; Management; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9797032,0.0005421776,0.0007400623,0.002578995,0.7916131,0.004239166,0.004306291,0.0005250446,0.0005251824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8428411,0.0004866864,0.0002292703,0.003255791,0.0009207151,0.001585424,0.002615199,0.8977349,0.0003648902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001943148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008560561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03970158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0167292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.06432424,0.926736,0.0009980602,0.0005291624,0.005024329,0.002388212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5011794,0.4947471,0.0002926262,0.001440018,0.001621875,0.0007189374],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001950715,0.0003976061,0.0066388,0.00008634647,0.00009985688,0.00002037973,0.9442194,0.009775209,0.002142563,0.0001510597,0.0004001036,0.03587367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001484343,0.001202848,0.01445768,0.0009697108,0.00002562371,0.00003175795,0.8228355,0.0009449392,0.00003427327,0.0005013569,0.1570732,0.0004387779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496523,0.0007956791,0.00004200431,0.005697604,0.000397608,0.00169123,0.000001382006,0.000267463,0.04145475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909836,0.0007889009,0.0007797535,0.0003252465,0.0004733064,0.0001536421,0.00003425479,0.0001426826,0.006318578],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2546402542475389,"score_gpt":0.4734688999873672,"score_spread":0.2188286457398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}