{"id":"W2910948534","doi":"10.15402/esj.v4i2.61748","title":"Learning to “Walk the Talk”: Reflexive Evaluation in Community-First Engaged Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Introspection; Participatory evaluation; Sociology; Accountability; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Community building; Community engagement; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Corporate governance; Political science; Psychology; Management; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5404534,0.002676237,0.003339077,0.01005479,0.01693584,0.03290023,0.00915342,0.008564782,0.00676445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5676528,0.002414447,0.002531615,0.006079813,0.08691952,0.02412753,0.03539738,0.01477316,0.002173631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02119562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05512459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005081768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007087964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2429285,0.7151181,0.008921073,0.01124522,0.01789201,0.003895167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.236599,0.6464945,0.0174045,0.05535057,0.03512821,0.009023225],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002338919,0.0004159871,0.001908039,0.002903091,0.0001436774,0.0005149283,0.784029,0.001133476,0.001411006,0.1088431,0.005040138,0.0934236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000573996,0.0009897626,0.002487586,0.01534788,0.0002021947,0.0006893604,0.4949036,0.004941668,0.005628722,0.3082768,0.165446,0.0005124777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.098457,0.005686598,0.7132599,0.06644256,0.002496728,0.02194229,0.0002854945,0.00160113,0.08982824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5239779,0.002302742,0.4202623,0.009563107,0.0003263108,0.03618834,0.0001802326,0.0008781,0.006320897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5404534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5667028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2546402542475389,"score_gpt":0.4734688999873672,"score_spread":0.2188286457398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}