{"id":"W2911016227","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2018.0045","title":"Credit, Copyright, and the Circulation of Scientific Knowledge: The Royal Society in the Long Nineteenth Century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Royal Society","keywords":"Copying; Legislation; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Law; Reuse; Originality; Balance sheet; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Finance; Creativity; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05767822,0.0001590913,0.0004680984,0.002044027,0.001009754,0.002447845,0.002843184,0.00008885813,0.001057008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01553021,0.00005579978,0.0002981321,0.05958166,0.003511992,0.0001979847,0.0005325745,0.0003447795,0.000188046],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000482681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002863612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003250187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003503147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912903,0.001537344,0.001000219,0.0005937095,0.005142919,0.0004355646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903255,0.00593667,0.0004141494,0.001371965,0.001785994,0.0001657402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000783324,0.0005595468,0.102623,0.0008292809,0.0001001084,0.000007270732,0.01553564,0.000005380869,0.00009851107,0.02079828,0.5771567,0.2822081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004931557,0.00004617494,0.1342255,0.0002193555,0.00002612151,0.00000479832,0.0001991586,0.004797804,0.00001251218,0.0007474165,0.8591304,0.00009764173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1708694,0.7825382,0.001358792,0.01959173,0.005389055,0.003819802,0.00006756328,0.00002904387,0.01633644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779001,0.02069168,0.00004732316,0.0005281278,0.0005045303,0.0000383719,0.000004134693,0.000006880887,0.0002788455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8070307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2289728456762306,"score_gpt":0.4941098094251575,"score_spread":0.2651369637489269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}