{"id":"W2911230058","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.01.033","title":"Assessment of alternative methods for analyzing X-ray fluorescence spectra","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","topic":"X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Amplitude; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Lead (geology); Spectral line; X-ray fluorescence; Chemistry; Materials science; Mathematics; Statistics; Computational physics; Fluorescence; Physics; Optics; Geology; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002813498,0.0001184591,0.0002668176,0.000093922,0.00007195574,0.00003752338,0.0001048487,0.00002533016,0.0002721599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000342668,0.0001053106,0.0000888889,0.0001682952,0.00003605701,0.000109055,0.00001986659,0.00007904549,0.000005876234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001746264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003361075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006755601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.829516e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992402,0.00003178145,0.0002267785,0.0002549323,0.00008684307,0.0001594849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994464,0.000136361,0.0001715152,0.0001593916,0.00004031831,0.00004600599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002489178,0.0001037893,0.1221572,0.00003533966,0.0003043103,5.350921e-8,0.0005009279,0.0006239872,0.2484404,0.4932562,0.00005818161,0.1344947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003642774,0.000376411,0.3168269,0.00006500699,0.0004861719,2.416942e-7,0.002232491,0.1966879,0.432231,0.03919728,0.007296184,0.0009576455],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1497982,0.0001156622,0.8362579,0.0001220795,0.0001148613,0.0007682131,0.00002581657,0.00001937856,0.01277788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8821493,0.00003489407,0.1174803,0.0000296275,0.0001002851,0.00005013472,0.00003319118,0.000008728631,0.0001135048],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7323511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4294443,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00848998719287236,"score_gpt":0.3228031523679505,"score_spread":0.3143131651750781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}