{"id":"W2911338233","doi":"10.1101/540468","title":"Optimal sample size calculation for null hypothesis significance tests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Statistics; Type I and type II errors; Statistical power; Sample (material); Null hypothesis; Estimation; Mathematics; Sampling (signal processing); Econometrics; Nominal level; Statistical hypothesis testing; Computer science; Confidence interval; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05006897,0.001108205,0.001841081,0.003257124,0.0009006415,0.002105719,0.00224998,0.002001917,0.005746777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2565481,0.0009418278,0.001230052,0.001755946,0.00204153,0.002520501,0.001982302,0.003207448,0.001062726],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001424038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002827826,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007027243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007269938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9603501,0.0285114,0.002129119,0.002421776,0.00606499,0.0005226274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8177187,0.1574571,0.004800966,0.008674827,0.01055882,0.0007896117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003446179,0.0006610291,0.01315513,0.002766648,0.0005847849,0.0006190748,0.0008624793,0.06477389,0.02610485,0.1411151,0.01724,0.7286708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00165259,0.002166217,0.01185939,0.001453353,0.0003933026,0.0007608805,0.0005049641,0.4772416,0.06179936,0.4127009,0.02918531,0.0002820403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007824782,0.0002608818,0.9883569,0.0003241853,0.0001650089,0.0008346719,0.0001750489,0.0005770567,0.00148135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0821425,0.0001501896,0.9136347,0.0002650955,0.00009224869,0.0028599,0.0002234618,0.0002958059,0.0003361043],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.949931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2647932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02871511017194025,"score_gpt":0.2336416632616889,"score_spread":0.2049265530897487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}