{"id":"W2911532086","doi":"10.3758/s13423-018-1555-1","title":"A statistical test for the optimality of deliberative time allocation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Variety (cybernetics); Incentive; Rationality; Test (biology); Psychology; Task (project management); Consistency (knowledge bases); Dynamic inconsistency; Microeconomics; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00461196,0.0001563764,0.0005908394,0.00004483615,0.00007672182,0.0000975212,0.0008209661,0.00005399965,0.008630723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002802171,0.0000937776,0.0002185948,0.0001628907,0.0001084819,0.00005712601,0.00007578437,0.0001102287,0.009546194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004056548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006913848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000138565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001867255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997682,0.0001495925,0.001180156,0.0005128947,0.0002908905,0.0001844362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989681,0.008418458,0.0005695787,0.0009544833,0.0003097515,0.00006673931],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004338106,0.0001134099,0.0003766757,0.00007494925,0.00001479998,1.576977e-7,0.00003305233,0.00005610424,0.00006604211,0.0008093934,0.3020187,0.6963933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003590293,0.0001615915,0.001939763,0.000452966,0.0000701457,0.000006157839,0.00003506623,0.001824061,0.00001819449,0.007434502,0.987528,0.0001705668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4534769,0.1297541,0.157847,0.1769784,0.007561354,0.02408161,0.002914634,0.0002571602,0.04712877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099468,0.02634832,0.1240598,0.0173007,0.0005520596,0.0009338718,0.0001306142,0.0001529838,0.02057481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6962227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09454468385242114,"score_gpt":0.4226450988256062,"score_spread":0.328100414973185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}