{"id":"W2911545882","doi":"10.1139/er-2018-0118","title":"Quantifying the impacts of oil sands development on wildlife: perspectives from impact assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada); Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Rigour; Wildlife conservation; Impact assessment; Environmental science; Cumulative effects; Expert opinion; Environmental planning; Geography; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209445,0.0004731984,0.0006047102,0.00003697392,0.0002451203,0.00004648263,0.0005744338,0.000110095,0.008689155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002692413,0.000298016,0.0003442978,0.0001707836,0.0003042531,0.0003994462,0.0003891509,0.0003328661,0.005549989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001291382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002097553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003067925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003648899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969934,0.0002988426,0.0006766444,0.0006036834,0.0009046632,0.0005227722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998454,0.0001421853,0.0004852433,0.0006960314,5.159347e-7,0.0002219897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007136558,0.000743916,0.8647754,0.00001360375,0.0001253305,0.00000325496,0.003460146,0.00005986264,0.06175438,0.000006350847,0.001211945,0.0677745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006629231,0.000312253,0.9294457,0.0001407938,0.00004591241,0.000002393759,0.001583326,0.00003906397,0.003492076,0.00002458368,0.06383348,0.0004174937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879302,0.001818521,0.00001341029,0.00009256198,0.0001798572,0.0005157857,0.00003324408,0.00001802804,0.009398431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931164,0.004112578,0.0007953788,0.0005144145,0.00005650504,0.00004806172,0.000066318,0.00004492822,0.001245359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06735701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03470588751860315,"score_gpt":0.3420460937057323,"score_spread":0.3073402061871292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}