{"id":"W2911545882","doi":"10.1139/er-2018-0118","title":"Quantifying the impacts of oil sands development on wildlife: perspectives from impact assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada); Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Rigour; Wildlife conservation; Impact assessment; Environmental science; Cumulative effects; Expert opinion; Environmental planning; Geography; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01605387,0.0009455546,0.0007444641,0.004458602,0.0007069514,0.004027395,0.00084965,0.0007029949,0.0009726426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01990088,0.0002522892,0.0006813603,0.00422014,0.002309378,0.002126185,0.001149863,0.0008584445,0.0001131491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005066874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006558381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2014941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.358738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910458,0.005644633,0.0004525818,0.0003967826,0.002122704,0.0003375954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817884,0.01160102,0.00135575,0.0006222197,0.004393861,0.0002387399],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001305837,0.0001221361,0.197014,0.004054385,0.0009102093,0.0005691454,0.004430174,0.08804858,0.001927326,0.05089572,0.008393974,0.6435037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003560644,0.0009234283,0.4639026,0.01474681,0.00105468,0.0008483627,0.03000963,0.0454129,0.008463981,0.08319206,0.3510186,0.0003914383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.4218229,0.3610741,0.05933699,0.02820587,0.0003766892,0.0002869532,0.002462269,0.0001827054,0.1262516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419152,0.1317143,0.02191343,0.0006855608,0.000158481,0.00005836838,0.0004150577,0.00003113503,0.00310843],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4006425,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03470588751860315,"score_gpt":0.3420460937057323,"score_spread":0.3073402061871292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}