{"id":"W2911617825","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2018-0142","title":"Size-specific apparent survival rate estimates of white sharks using mark–recapture models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service; National Park Service; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Montana State University","keywords":"Carcharias; Biology; Foraging; Mark and recapture; Vital rates; Fecundity; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population; Predation; White (mutation); Optimal foraging theory; Fishery; Zoology; Demography; Population growth; Juvenile","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004706766,0.0005187817,0.0004157771,0.001001047,0.0002047832,0.0006381378,0.001205133,0.0003765628,0.001037228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008468955,0.0004239957,0.000960708,0.0005369126,0.000294386,0.0008324225,0.000435697,0.0004523889,0.0003380149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005961285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003816376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01024272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01568724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993324,0.0002398549,0.00004793024,0.0002704171,0.00005814927,0.00005125097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968321,0.001671567,0.000825158,0.0003657742,0.0002341388,0.00007130126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002001845,0.00008099712,0.4862556,0.0001483251,0.0009968181,0.000280057,0.0005404695,0.450122,0.005168099,0.007598041,0.001562824,0.04704661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733378,0.0001706977,0.1956397,0.00003895666,0.0002348238,0.0002881348,0.0001412614,0.7922779,0.001279643,0.008563228,0.001276228,0.00007207376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7494059,0.0002980639,0.2472023,0.0001169549,0.00003491834,0.00005473647,0.001201777,0.0002607981,0.001424599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786922,0.0001186888,0.01855712,0.00003624184,0.00001650607,0.00006208238,0.001187523,0.00004035407,0.001289322],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01024272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02489209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02406507931541037,"score_gpt":0.2156918895254445,"score_spread":0.1916268102100341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}