{"id":"W29116834","doi":"10.2105/ajph.2017.304147","title":"Consideration of Uncertainties in Environmental Protection Plans and Follow-up Programs in Canadian EIA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"American journal of public health","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Terminology; Environmental impact assessment; Consistency (knowledge bases); Environmental planning; Environmental impact statement; Legislation; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Environmental science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001312466,0.0001821716,0.0005153258,0.0002944741,0.00008249054,0.00003659547,0.0001243867,0.00009727887,0.0001068548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005674837,0.0001753463,0.00005820895,0.0002387523,0.0002731476,0.0002930779,0.00001684316,0.0004028893,0.000003662322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00195816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004676479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4368598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7432122,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978201,0.000389996,0.00073066,0.0001868218,0.000415317,0.00045704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984272,0.00002838015,0.001003064,0.00008887427,0.000005639171,0.0004469187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003770279,0.0001403597,0.7419276,0.00003663092,0.00002031239,0.000006257439,0.008783453,0.00004219337,0.0001924774,0.00001386523,0.000043969,0.2487552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006297043,0.001238407,0.975743,0.0001276988,0.000007238575,0.00001655902,0.02030901,0.00007849795,0.0000194316,0.000129449,0.001524576,0.0001764498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980706,0.00005996746,0.00002501177,0.0008021831,0.0001863747,0.0003943118,0.00001472873,0.000002364689,0.0004444513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990673,0.0002960734,0.0001531509,0.0001765153,0.00002940285,0.00001522483,0.00008974146,0.00001842328,0.0001541749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3063525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7150413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02930169400046662,"score_gpt":0.2891186031764434,"score_spread":0.2598169091759768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}