{"id":"W2911838273","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.49.4.437","title":"Reciprocity of Intra-Family Dyadic Relations from Adolescents’ Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Construct (python library); Parental control; Interpersonal relationship","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001232828,0.0001194882,0.0001595228,0.0007139501,0.0006775376,0.001378709,0.0001767301,0.0002068644,0.001280469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003220451,0.0001085981,0.0001468754,0.0003094176,0.0006827976,0.0008186654,0.0007853583,0.0003537374,0.00009738842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003281942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003074281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00141827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002782934,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986621,0.0008813518,0.00005893336,0.0001044599,0.0001998079,0.00009335756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983316,0.0006429694,0.0004650961,0.0001486795,0.0002433254,0.00016834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001579496,0.00009596442,0.6926761,0.0001212507,0.00009379282,0.001490076,0.2187249,0.0005963023,0.006897548,0.01210299,0.0004717911,0.06657123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009210539,0.0002614199,0.7182251,0.0001089605,0.00007704738,0.003180799,0.2518947,0.002310338,0.0018743,0.005370427,0.0166382,0.00004946589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912261,0.0002620744,0.002649105,0.0001021855,0.000006587977,0.00001075879,0.00002209392,0.000007169345,0.005713955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992626,0.00009404908,0.0003320753,0.000003389322,0.000002066338,0.00000385646,0.000009535423,0.000001436949,0.0002910676],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00141827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006519914,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2692033507219517,"score_gpt":0.4882281061895786,"score_spread":0.219024755467627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}