{"id":"W2911838273","doi":"10.3138/jcfs.49.4.437","title":"Reciprocity of Intra-Family Dyadic Relations from Adolescents’ Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Family Studies","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Construct (python library); Parental control; Interpersonal relationship","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005315048,0.0002160412,0.0008171897,0.0002697899,0.0002039752,0.0000176246,0.000325388,0.000103379,0.0004541941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002991797,0.0001591134,0.0002179552,0.0005439707,0.001557573,0.0001555488,0.00009676501,0.0006623886,0.0002486257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009938492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001034867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004127893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975018,0.0006793861,0.0007764014,0.0002890164,0.0004611246,0.0002922667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939457,0.000908803,0.00064633,0.0002146638,0.004165045,0.0001194486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01236749,0.003379269,0.3645555,0.00005792663,0.01431582,0.0002663084,0.2668197,0.000005340466,0.02990579,0.03861159,0.2486659,0.02104936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001630694,0.0017316,0.8505183,0.0002795161,0.000119292,0.00001222072,0.1241031,0.00000292157,0.0004216367,0.01816848,0.002847486,0.0001647064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9019291,0.01561937,0.001009371,0.0002953102,0.001035617,0.0002137147,0.00005796195,0.00001118848,0.07982838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975759,0.0003656893,0.000680849,0.0003537506,0.0006174943,0.000006902768,0.000001201564,0.000009471203,0.0003887026],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4859628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6488454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2692033507219517,"score_gpt":0.4882281061895786,"score_spread":0.219024755467627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}