{"id":"W2912059615","doi":"10.1002/ecy.2640","title":"A comparative evaluation of five common pairwise tests of species association","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Science Centre; Algoma University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Government of Ontario; Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Association (psychology); Biology; Ecology; Common species; Statistics; Mathematics; Psychology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07689596,0.001943666,0.002663493,0.007597944,0.002143529,0.002791171,0.004546146,0.002160528,0.00355676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2733864,0.0005906764,0.003774506,0.006356191,0.004954249,0.005714354,0.003729176,0.002837077,0.000513519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002191397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002254972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002212602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003822993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9148132,0.05070835,0.008300528,0.01117242,0.01255543,0.002450078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4365887,0.5092486,0.01728828,0.0149089,0.01733348,0.004632053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01412644,0.001455931,0.5091076,0.003542071,0.01320748,0.001161575,0.003242812,0.06491412,0.01809189,0.03455947,0.008047504,0.3285431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00136565,0.01538802,0.395944,0.0005320011,0.00326575,0.00417746,0.003905479,0.4739252,0.03485804,0.05547935,0.01021422,0.00094479],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8018477,0.00237266,0.1822058,0.0004927859,0.0004783192,0.0006866425,0.001851187,0.001064221,0.009000725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178641,0.0001818385,0.07910692,0.0001145335,0.00006274576,0.0004258321,0.001335338,0.0002533187,0.0006552507],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.923104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4066696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08999644890012963,"score_gpt":0.2785650481881626,"score_spread":0.188568599288033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}