{"id":"W2912441099","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.015","title":"Determining the retention of removable partial dentures","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; King Saud University","keywords":"Dentures; Mastication; Abutment; Removable partial denture; Orthodontics; Dentistry; Statistical analysis; Occlusion; Bite force quotient; Universal testing machine; Materials science; Computer science; Mathematics; Medicine; Composite material; Engineering; Structural engineering; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000512765,0.0001029486,0.0002410152,0.00006219028,0.00007984288,0.00012911,0.0003186282,0.00008566378,0.0005635339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008500872,0.00006607159,0.0001990088,0.0001031675,0.0000766722,0.0002242654,0.00006911276,0.0001757688,0.0001746939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003045792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005265363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006205908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000527193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984901,0.00009845115,0.0006744779,0.0001047426,0.0004775281,0.0001546756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985867,0.00004194222,0.0008499975,0.0002519581,0.0002197295,0.00004968198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004150402,0.0006244087,0.284514,0.0004038412,0.0002622372,0.0006058223,0.0003978608,0.0001831499,0.6972206,0.002133356,0.008330601,0.004909046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003578008,0.0006847148,0.803398,0.0006880104,0.000293894,0.008255816,0.0008606231,0.0001380129,0.163343,0.001705245,0.01669615,0.0003585886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935898,0.0001981592,0.0001173427,0.00005046854,0.005080046,0.0001584078,0.00001046498,0.000006842956,0.0007884569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967184,0.00001855141,0.0002686986,0.00002140791,0.0002049401,0.000001906096,0.000003741581,0.00001517277,0.002747193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5338776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6170301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0176606367197333,"score_gpt":0.2729692102666998,"score_spread":0.2553085735469665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}