{"id":"W2912770999","doi":"10.37358/rc.17.8.5754","title":"Water Quality Index, a Useful Tool for Evaluation of Danube River Raw Water","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Chimie","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Index (typography); Sampling (signal processing); Raw water; Environmental engineering; Hydrology (agriculture); Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858311,0.0001170126,0.0001952623,0.00001750184,0.0002938828,0.0001121539,0.0003237977,0.00007184101,0.001871945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001092737,0.00007388843,0.0001126284,0.00001384943,0.0002271949,0.0002880697,0.0001984658,0.0000686498,0.0002086654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000239163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001862567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003383553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003762334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983561,0.0002866755,0.0003429008,0.0002477292,0.0004778678,0.0002887268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990885,0.00002851175,0.0001376011,0.0006512735,0.00003261819,0.00006150821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005899833,0.0008285086,0.5796456,0.000720013,0.0002341377,0.000004533236,0.01709768,0.003019721,0.3534101,0.005763541,0.008294769,0.03039135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002043181,0.00005802881,0.7310765,0.00004207029,0.0001107003,0.000002838575,0.00003317853,0.001929407,0.1935631,0.005729782,0.06510589,0.0003053845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994639,0.000008479284,0.00220375,0.001067441,0.00007685298,0.000529068,0.00002729595,0.00001302076,0.001435026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844,0.000005213241,0.0004004274,0.0002279433,0.00005154327,0.00005720547,0.00003848156,0.000009524128,0.0007697226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1598471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08008356231866517,"score_gpt":0.3663174593681057,"score_spread":0.2862338970494406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}