{"id":"W2912770999","doi":"10.37358/rc.17.8.5754","title":"Water Quality Index, a Useful Tool for Evaluation of Danube River Raw Water","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Chimie","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Index (typography); Sampling (signal processing); Raw water; Environmental engineering; Hydrology (agriculture); Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001480034,0.0008294165,0.0007700682,0.007023059,0.0004226727,0.00129753,0.0003543629,0.0003507229,0.002806422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003071238,0.0001810773,0.0004226116,0.005150113,0.0003140042,0.0008735978,0.0007579084,0.000411083,0.0008175646],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005765299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006237904,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002921456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004600552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983329,0.0003486561,0.0002229259,0.0002117772,0.0008111988,0.00007254068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988326,0.0002702937,0.0002633873,0.00008178163,0.0004843039,0.00006765377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007050711,0.0004135436,0.3925231,0.001409378,0.0004955868,0.0004959892,0.001110943,0.008468843,0.06009246,0.003431539,0.01724219,0.5136114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004977892,0.001177225,0.7908131,0.0003445174,0.0002945428,0.001101516,0.002588658,0.04870441,0.04921341,0.005887442,0.09960257,0.0002227849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6914198,0.007281922,0.195515,0.0004875663,0.0004109564,0.001362182,0.03060446,0.003680538,0.06923754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016579,0.001380667,0.08022313,0.0001067846,0.00007575325,0.0006545199,0.009198282,0.0001694621,0.006533388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007023059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009388447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08008356231866517,"score_gpt":0.3663174593681057,"score_spread":0.2862338970494406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}