{"id":"W2913282704","doi":"10.14740/jocmr3724","title":"Hyperbilirubinemia as a Predictor of Appendiceal Perforation: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Meta-Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","topic":"Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Diagnostic odds ratio; Confidence interval; Meta-analysis; Odds ratio; Receiver operating characteristic; Perforation; Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing; Internal medicine; Cochrane Library; Area under the curve; Gastroenterology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03412236,0.0005807977,0.0278427,0.001716394,0.000074273,0.00002883728,0.0007501704,0.0004814813,0.002532816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1408505,0.0002909356,0.005440924,0.00229352,0.0007857791,0.0001221194,0.0003404943,0.002898584,0.0001243527],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001331851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001461125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003636883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004907204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9823411,0.003066775,0.009614856,0.000672714,0.003798727,0.0005057887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9205736,0.06824053,0.006147793,0.001494638,0.002520271,0.001023196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002768118,0.0005620609,0.0002831533,0.8558413,0.1230636,0.0003886905,0.00002232977,1.434455e-7,4.048793e-8,0.00008960889,0.01069122,0.009030143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008313174,0.004356481,0.00006687782,0.3026227,0.5993775,0.0004642531,0.00006276056,0.000005230024,6.714787e-8,0.0000218573,0.09206364,0.0001273735],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001294425,0.9876373,0.00002057419,0.004681319,0.0001845527,0.006226358,0.00003776697,0.000008135509,0.001191063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003778671,0.9961745,0.0001111186,0.0006610601,0.0008408545,0.0002479157,0.00005122761,0.00006206244,0.001473454],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5532187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5569125094480116,"score_gpt":0.6085015249681419,"score_spread":0.05158901552013029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}