{"id":"W2913359310","doi":"10.1177/0022219419825855","title":"Are Reading Interventions for English Language Learners Effective? A Meta-Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ell; Fluency; Reading (process); Psychological intervention; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Meta-analysis; Intervention (counseling); Dyslexia; Comprehension; English language; Developmental psychology; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Medicine; Vocabulary development; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003033385,0.0004875903,0.005571755,0.001089806,0.0001286286,0.0001784037,0.000450546,0.0002911739,0.001431406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00467176,0.0003377457,0.01391826,0.0005783644,0.0001034686,0.0001657665,0.00006253589,0.001261545,0.00008336111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002923586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007880809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001599494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004485295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953505,0.001714991,0.001766011,0.0004416651,0.0003307835,0.0003960192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896695,0.005859279,0.003589313,0.0004377077,0.0003284703,0.000115721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007982157,0.0003430236,0.001101265,0.04174552,0.5714327,0.00002543112,0.08247097,0.0003293452,6.802981e-8,0.0006564029,0.004960582,0.2968549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001809981,0.0002011377,0.00002643199,0.002798998,0.2597283,0.0000321626,0.04078329,0.000001446271,6.486087e-8,0.00001653615,0.6959558,0.0002749372],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002936576,0.9949837,0.000517421,0.00002302425,0.001188113,0.0007356511,0.00005717464,0.00004378008,0.002157448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004790247,0.8222116,0.0012715,0.00003804074,0.001546468,0.0009625659,0.0001840075,0.0002700279,0.1687256],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6909952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1527522079805895,"score_gpt":0.4456348541275843,"score_spread":0.2928826461469948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}